<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is Deep Church? : In&#160;Outline</title>
	<atom:link href="http://deepchurch.org.uk/2007/11/26/what-is-deep-church-in-outline/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://deepchurch.org.uk/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fdeepchurch.org.uk%2F2007%2F11%2F26%2Fwhat-is-deep-church-in-outline%2F&amp;seed_title=What+is+Deep+Church%3F+%3A+In%26%23160%3BOutline</link>
	<description>remembering our past to face our future</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 03:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Makeesha Fisher</title>
		<link>http://deepchurch.org.uk/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fdeepchurch.org.uk%2F2007%2F11%2F26%2Fwhat-is-deep-church-in-outline%2F&amp;seed_title=What+is+Deep+Church%3F+%3A+In%26%23160%3BOutline#comment-500</link>
		<dc:creator>Makeesha Fisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 15:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deepchurch.org.uk/2007/11/26/what-is-deep-church-in-outline/#comment-500</guid>
		<description>sounds great. I'm still not sure I understand if this is separate from everything else happening in the church (cuz as I've mentioned to paul it sounds very emerging-missional to me) or in addition to or part of or what but I think most of what you've said here is pretty good.

I'll have to read your beef with parachurch though - it's interesting because a Vineyard pastor friend of ours has big feelings against parachurch as well - or more to the point, he doesn't like parachurch "replacing" "real church".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sounds great. I&#8217;m still not sure I understand if this is separate from everything else happening in the church (cuz as I&#8217;ve mentioned to paul it sounds very emerging-missional to me) or in addition to or part of or what but I think most of what you&#8217;ve said here is pretty good.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll have to read your beef with parachurch though - it&#8217;s interesting because a Vineyard pastor friend of ours has big feelings against parachurch as well - or more to the point, he doesn&#8217;t like parachurch &#8220;replacing&#8221; &#8220;real church&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
